Jens Axboe wrote:
> Can't reproduce. If I were to venture a guess, I would say that it's a
> combination of:
>
> - small bw window (it's only 500 msec)
> - larger block size (64kb)
> - other activity on the drive?
>
> Was the tested drive otherwise idle?
>
yes it was totally dedicated to fio but the test was quite long.
I did a test on a raid controller, my device was 1.16 TB big.
Maybe fio failed on such bug array.
Erwan,
Received on Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:50:45 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:00:01 CEST